So Much for Agreement

My folks sent me away to a fancy prep school.  I think I struggled acclimating to an environment where the guy who lived next door to me flew back to school in the family’s LearJet, others whose parents were big wigs in business and government, and everyone seemed to come from a privileged background.

I learned a lot at that school, despite my adolescent insecurities.  I am pretty certain that one of the things I learned was that pronouns are to agree with their antecedents.  If not there, then I learned it in the “lesser” schools I attended prior to going to St. Andrew’s.  I know I currently teach the skill in a public school fourth grade.

That is why I am surprised to have read the following just now:

PLEASE LIST THE NAME OF YOUR GUEST/SPOUSE WHO WILL BE ATTENDING REUNION SO WE CAN PROVIDE THEM WITH NAMETAGS.

THEM refers to the antecedent GUEST/SPOUSEGUEST/SPOUSE is singular, THEM is plural.  Forget the all caps and forget that English does not have a gender-neutral possessive pronoun to use for words such as guest and spouseHis is the traditional possessive pronoun to use in this case.  I know, some folks state that does not work either.  Fine.  What we do have is a plural possessive pronoun whose antecedent is a singular noun.  That is incorrect.  At minimum, the sentence needs to be re-worded so not to end in a situation where a plural possessive pronoun can be contemplated to be proper for a singular noun.

So much for that subsidized $38,000 tuition.

Also blogged on this date . . .

Tags: , ,

Post a Comment

By submitting a comment here you grant ladow.net a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution.