Electoral College
New Jersey no longer cares what how its citizens vote.
Yesterday Governor Corzine signed a law that would have New Jersey’s electors vote for the candidate who has the most popular votes nationally.
That is correct . . . New Jersey’s electorate does not matter. The national popular vote will decide how the state’s electors in the Electoral College will vote, not how New Jersey’s citizens vote.
New Jersey on Sunday became the second state to enter a compact that would eliminate the Electoral College’s power to choose a president if enough states endorse the idea.Gov. Jon S. Corzine signed legislation that approves delivering the state’s 15 electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote. The Assembly approved the bill last month and the Senate followed suit earlier this month.
This is a reaction to the Democrat Party still feeling Al Gore won the 2000 election. What it, and apparently the Garden State’s government, does not understand is the popular vote does not elect presidents. Rather, an Electoral College votes for the president. Citizens when they pull the lever are actually voting for the slate of Electors. Electors are supposed to vote for whom their constituents have voted. Occasionally there is a protest vote. These faithless electors have been few in our history.
New Jersey’s state constitutuion states:
ARTICLE II
ELECTIONS AND SUFFRAGESECTION I
(c) Any person registered as a voter in any election district of this State who has removed or shall remove to another state or to another county within this State and is not able there to qualify to vote by reason of an insufficient period of residence in such state or county, shall, as a citizen of the United States, have the right to vote for electors for President and Vice President of the United States, only, by Presidential Elector Absentee Ballot, in the county from which he has removed, in such manner as the Legislature shall provide.
This will only take effect if enough states pass similar legislation.
It is absolutely unbelievable to me that our government is attempting to undermine its citizens like this. But then again, we spent millions of dollars to move our presidential primary from June to February so New Jersey would be more relevant.
How relevant are we though? No candidates are campaigning here. And why should they. On Super Tuesday, candidates will be stretched between New Jersey and Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho (Dem.), Illinois, Kansas (Dem.), Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana (GOP), New Mexico (Dem.), New York, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Utah, West Virginia (GOP).
We’ve come a long way from the New Jersey Plan.
Also blogged on this date . . .
- Welcome to Cumberland Pond - 2008
- Corzine Wants More Debt - 2007
- Joe Buck Stupidity of the Day - 2007
- What $88.9 Billion Buys - 2007
- On Geocoins - 2006
- Super Bowl VII - 1973
Tags: 2008-Election, Corzine, Dick-Codey, election, New Jersey, Politics, primary

By Zooomabooma on Jan 16, 2008
“How relevant are we though?” you ask. Good question. How come not everyone’s allowed to decide who becomes the candidate for President in each party? One must ask oneself: Self, is that right?
Personally, I don’t think so. For many American citizens — their opinion matters. For many other American citizens — nope.
Onward — how relevant is the electoral college? Wasn’t it intended, at least in part, to be a safeguard against electing a President who might be loyal to a nation who would want the Colonies as their own? (Or something like that?)
One must ask oneself: Is it right that a person can receive the most votes and be the one who a majority of THE PEOPLE want as President but lose?
“You’re the most popular but ohhhh, so sorry, you lose.”
That makes no sense.
But the electoral college guarantees that the person with the most votes will NOT necessarily be President.
Why shouldn’t the most popular person win?
All I see is problems with the whole process. Makes me shake my head in disbelief.
By Bob on Jan 16, 2008
I am comfortable that the popular vote does not necessarily result in a president. The Electoral College safeguards against mob rule.
If we just want a popular president, let’s set up an American Idol contest for them and vote the candidates off week-by-week.
I want a president who will make the best decisions whether he is liked or not. The popular president would have withdrawn from Iraq by now.