Dot . . . Dot . . . Dot . . .
Been busy . . . reached 50,000 spam messages caught by Askimet . . . kicking back on this four-day weekend . . . want some interesting NJ data? . . . found what I consider is the worst cache ever and it’s right here in South Jersey . . . Beetle bonded with her great-grandmother. They were so cute together . . . this is customer service. I wish everyone was this responsive . . . I’m beat . . . I watched a couple episodes of that bounty hunter guy this evening. They live in a different world than I do . . . have two UN Diabetes travel bugs to drop. I had planned heading north, but it looks like I will not be. Hmmm . . . Beetle has lined up several of her stuffed animals and dolls in a (chorus) lineon the floor in my room . . . shhh, she has OCD . . . been contemplating an idea that I have mulled over before: it seems most caches are archived because the cache goes MIA. Does that mean that caches are seen as disposable? There are notable exceptions, but it seems more likely the case than not . . . just a follow-up to that: how many ammo boxes go MIA? . . . we have watched a Barbie movie with Pegasus so many times this week that I can quote it . . .
Also blogged on this date . . .
- Jumping the Shark - 2008
- Baby - 2006
- Missing ZIP codes - 2006
- Pedometers - 2005
- HORSE HITCHING POSTS - 2005
- Corner the Stone - 2005
- Mandy Patinkin - 2002
By Frodo on Feb 18, 2007
You said: “. . . found what I consider is the worst cache ever and it’s right here in South Jersey . . .”
But there is no link. Inquiring minds want to know. I hope it was not one of mine!
By Bob on Feb 18, 2007
I probably should not have written that. Nevertheless, I am not going to out that cache. We each have our own criteria. Someone actually called this one “great” in his log. So be it.
Heck, someone gave me the finger on a cache of mine because presumably he could not solve the puzzle.
All there is to do is find the next cache.
By Frodo on Feb 18, 2007
Fair enough. I just could not resist asking.
I suppose as in beauty, cache lameness is in the eye of the beholder.
By Bob on Feb 18, 2007
Although KBI (and others) will argue endlessly that there are no lame caches.
Personally, I think that one can quantify these things. Using standards, such as the ones I outlined here, one could devise a metric that would measure lameness against those standards. It would be How well does the cache meet these criteria? rating. True, you and I may differ as to how well a specific cache may meet the standard, but at least there would be something to strive for. Truly great caches would separate themselves from the bulk of the caches, I would suspect.
But that is all for another day . . .